Connecting Souls and Personality

We went deeper into our discussions on death in class after reading A Dialogue on Personal Identity and Immortality. The book makes us think about the idea of souls, and offers the reader two different perspectives on them. On one hand, you have Gretchen Weirob who is not a beliver in our souls being connected to us and does not believe in any sort of afterlife. You also  have Sam Miller, who is trying to convince Gretchen of some sort of afterlife throughout the story by saying our souls live on after our bodies are dead. 
Gretchen says that since we only have access to our material bodies, we are not able to claim when a sould is around us because it is considered to be something immaterial. I personally agree with Sam's next claim that our bodies can express certain psychological characterisitcs we have like our emotions, so there is a connection of our bodies and souls. Gretchen is right about how we cannot be 100% certain of souls existence due to them not having a physical presence, but you could also say the same thing to argue against her point that our souls are seperate from our bodies.

I can understand the uncertainty  Gretchen feels about what happens with our souls after death, but would not expect most to feel the same way she does.  I think hoping for our souls to live on after us is an optimistic way a lot of people try look at their death.  So, I think Gretchen's views on souls may have to do with possible negative thoughts she has about death.

Comments

  1. HarrisonFebruary 10, 2019 at 10:08 AM

    I think that the reason Gretchen does not believe in an after life is because she is a philosopher and believes in something once it is proven true and that is why they are having the debate. I agree with the claim that since our bodies can express certain psychological characteristics that our bodies and souls are connected but Gretchen's argument against what Sam says in the dialogue is normally that souls are immaterial and cannot be certain they exist which is true and makes this whole dialogue pretty pointless to me because Sam is not going to be able to prove souls exist to Gretchen's satisfaction because they are immaterial and cannot be seen.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ethan HerringMarch 14, 2019 at 11:21 PM

    "I can understand the uncertainty Gretchen feels about what happens with our souls after death, but would not expect most to feel the same way she does."

    This raises a question that is somewhat fundamental to how each individual philosophizes about people: Cartesian vs phenomenological analysis. That is, the perception of the world as the sum of many objects acting upon one another versus the study of consciousness and the study of the world through what we can learn from conscious experience and of the phenomena thereof. That is, as it relates to the original poster's question, does it matter if people agree with Weirob? In other words, does intersubjective agreement constitute substantial evidence to believe something? If not, for what *does* it count?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Caitlin Doughty - Why are you afraid of death

Doughty created a video about common fears of death and how to find comfort in them. The way to get over death is to pinpoint the fear. One of the common fears of death relates to the fear of regretting experiences or not experiencing certain events. This fear is why I’m scared to die at a young age. Being able to look back on life and remembering experiences I have gone through and thinking about how full my life was is the goal. As silly as it sounds, I want to be able to tell stories of silly times I spent with friends or the moments of impulsivity that creates a story. Knowing that I have roughly 60 years of life to go and that I’ve lived ¼ of my life already, adds to the fear of dying young. In those years to come I know I will experience some great and horrible things but I still want to experience them. Dying young would end the cycle of being able to experience new moments and having stories to tell. It sounds selfish but I look at every moment has if it could be a story t...
Read more

Pros and Cons of Immortality

Immortality is ability to live forever. People who are immoral will never have to experience death because they have an eternal life. Thinking this, some people might think that is something they want because we will have an unlimited amount of time. We won't have to worry about death because it will never come. However, being immortal isn't as good as we make it out to be.  When making decisions, there are consequences in the decisions we make because we are picking one path and letting go of the other. You won’t get to experience the other path because you chose not to follow it and it messes with the one you did. With immortality, Immortals won’t have to make difficult decisions in their life because they are aware that they have an unlimited amount of time. People who are immortal can pick to do one thing and have the time to also achieve the other because they will live forever. The problem with this is that there is no significance people who are immortal have the abil...
Read more

confusing souls for personality

When talking about death it is not uncommon to mention souls and believing in souls. In A Dialogue on Personal Identity and Immortality written by John Perry, the characters Gretchen Weirob and Sam Miller are in debate relating to the proof of personal identity and sameness of soul. Weirob states her opinion that there is no personal identity for the reason that there is no proof stating we hold one soul. Miller disagrees saying that there is no proof of human bodies holding multiple souls. I agree with Miller and his argument from the first chapter of the book. There are ways to identify people and objects by characteristics. Without the characteristics then how can someone identify a person or object with no visual aid? Agreeing with Miller, the idea of having one soul in our body for our entire life is engraved in our minds. Having Weirob question that idea leaves me with more questions. A part in the book that stood out the most to me is the argument by Weirob saying “...t...
Read more